Wilfrid Sellars takes a lot of flak, principally from his proponents, for having a sort of roundabout writing style. But in his article-length intellectual biography, which has more than a few fascinating turns of phrase, he seems to show regret about his time at Oxford, seeking out the scientifically-oriented, plain-writing minds, as opposed to the writers (later better vindicated in time) who were writing a bit obliquely.
Anything that can be stated plainly can be discussed in a more careful manner. And if the thought itself is correct, a sea-green statement of pure intellectual objectivity does it no additional favors. Let it arise in its time.
Relatedly, in Ph.D. work, I took a lot of flak in the home department (though not in the other areas I studied) for being too theory-oriented. An American state university -- according to at least one etymological resource, the name originally meant "plain-speakers." As a result, when I did write a 400-page project for the committee, it was as plain as I could make it, and I shifted the complexity to the architectonic.